Whole of AI lifecycle

Whole of AI lifecycle statements apply across multiple AI product lifecycle stages, for ease of use and to minimise content duplication.

Off
Transactional services

Transactional services lead to a change in government-held records, typically involving an exchange of information, money, licences or goods.  

Examples of transactional services include: 

  • logging in to a portal or platform
  • submitting a claim
  • registering a business
  • updating contact details
  • lodging a tax return
  • subscribing to newsletters
  • grant applications
  • public consultation submissions. 
Off
Design

The design statements includes concept development, requirements engineering, and solution design.

Off
Data

The data statements cover the establishment of the processes and responsibilities for managing data across the AI lifecycle. This stage includes data used in experimenting, training, testing, and operating AI systems.

Off
Train

The train statements covers the creation and selection of models and algorithms. The key activities in this stage include modelling, pre and post-processing, model refinements, and fine-tuning. It also considers the use of pre-trained models and associated fine-tuning for the operational context.

Off
Evaluate

The evaluate statements' cover testing, verification, and validation of the whole AI system. It is assumed that agencies have existing capability on test management and on testing traditional software and systems. 

Off
Integrate

The integrate statements focuses on implementing and testing an AI system within an agency’s internal organisational environment, including with its systems and data.

Off
Deploy

The deploy statements caters for introducing all the AI technical components, datasets, and related code into a production environment where it can start processing live data.

Off
Monitor

The monitor statements provides for the operationa and maintenance of the AI system. Monitoring is critical to ensuring the reliability, availability, performance, security, safety, and compliance of an AI system after it is deployed. 

Off

The lifecycles statements 

Whole of AI lifecycle: statements 1 - 8

The challenges for government use of AI are complex and linked with other governance considerations, such as:

  • the APS Code of Conduct
  • data governance
  • cyber security
  • ICT infrastructure
  • privacy
  • sourcing and procurement
  • copyright
  • ethics practices.

Across the lifecycle stages, agencies should consider:

  • technology operations – to ensure compliance, efficiency, and ethical standards
  • reference architecture – to provide structured frameworks that guide the design, development, and management of AI solutions
  • people capabilities – having the specialised skills required for successful implementation
  • auditability – enabling external scrutiny, supporting transparency, and accountability
  • explainability – identifying what needs to be explained and when, making complex AI processes transparent and trustworthy
  • system bias – maintaining the role of positive bias in delivering meaningful outcomes, while mitigating the source and impacts of problematic bias
  • version control – tracking and managing changes to information to inform stakeholder decision-making
  • watermarking – to embed visual or hidden markers into generated content so that its creation details can be identified.

Notes: 

Connect with the digital community

Share, build or learn digital experience and skills with training and events, and collaborate with peers across government.