• High

    Cost, value and revenue are realistically estimated, forecast and monitored continuously. The project is at, or ahead of, budget

    Off
  • Medium high

    Cost, value and revenue are forecast and monitored regularly. The project is at, or ahead of, budget.

    Off
  • Medium

    The project is at, or ahead of, budget. Cost is monitored regularly.

    Off
  • Medium low

    The project is behind budget. Cost is monitored regularly.

    Off
  • Low

    Cost is not actively monitored. The project is over budget or there is no certainty of current status.

    Off
    • Cost, value and revenue are realistically estimated, forecast and monitored continuously. The project is at, or ahead of, budget

    • Cost, value and revenue are forecast and monitored regularly. The project is at, or ahead of, budget.

    • The project is at, or ahead of, budget. Cost is monitored regularly.

    • The project is behind budget. Cost is monitored regularly.

    • Cost is not actively monitored. The project is over budget or there is no certainty of current status.

  • Scope and change control

    The abstract nature of digital solutions can make scope management more difficult than for projects with tangible outputs. Robust scope management and change control processes are needed that drive management action.

    Scope definition should include data management and conversion, integration and interfacing, reporting, change management, as appropriate.

    • During scoping, projects should engage in rigorous up-front analysis about overarching design, consideration of options, critical interdependencies and business problem identification.
    • This is of particular importance when using agile in larger projects where these concerns can be overlooked.

    Processes need to account for changes in business requirements due to shifting business needs or discovery of misconceptions, reflecting budget cuts in scope changes, and highlighting reductions in scope to meet time or cost constraints.

    Projects that push scope into subsequent tranches, even through official change processes, can impact upon delivery confidence.

  • DCA tolerances

  • High

    A clear scope with measurable acceptance criteria, aligned to business need, refined through recent consultation with users, suppliers, project team and senior management, including benefits realisation activities. Change is minimal and well controlled.

    Off
  • Medium high

    A clear scope with acceptance criteria aligned to business need, developed through consultation with users, suppliers, project team and senior management, including benefits realisation activities. Change control may be slow to reflect implications of change across project.

    Off
  • Medium

    A scope referencing business need, developed with some consultation with users, suppliers, project team and senior management. Change control processes exist but is incomplete or needs improvement. Movement of scope between tranches is reflected in adjusted budget and schedule.

    Off
  • Implement security measures

     

    Secure by design: Use the Information Security Manualthe Essential Eight and other resources from the Australian Cyber Security Centre to thoroughly assess your service’s threats, posture and protections. Plan for which requirements and system hardening will support your service throughout design, build, operation and decommissioning.

    Off
  • Medium low

    A scope that lacks sufficient definition or clarity on acceptance criteria. Informal or undocumented change control.

    Off
  • Low

    Absence of scope definition or acceptance criteria. Change is not being controlled or substantial scope is being moved to subsequent tranches.

    Off
    • A clear scope with measurable acceptance criteria, aligned to business need, refined through recent consultation with users, suppliers, project team and senior management, including benefits realisation activities. Change is minimal and well controlled.

    • A clear scope with acceptance criteria aligned to business need, developed through consultation with users, suppliers, project team and senior management, including benefits realisation activities. Change control may be slow to reflect implications of change across project.

    • A scope referencing business need, developed with some consultation with users, suppliers, project team and senior management. Change control processes exist but is incomplete or needs improvement. Movement of scope between tranches is reflected in adjusted budget and schedule.

    • A scope that lacks sufficient definition or clarity on acceptance criteria. Informal or undocumented change control.

    • Absence of scope definition or acceptance criteria. Change is not being controlled or substantial scope is being moved to subsequent tranches.

  • Risk management 

    Risk management practices are reflected throughout the other categories, however delivery confidence can be improved with evidence of proactive risk management, clear and appropriate ownership of risk and active management of issues. 

    Confidence is impacted where risk management is treated exclusively as a compliance exercise, where risk controls do not materially reduce risk or where there is blame and confusion result from risks being triggered.

  • DCA tolerances

  • High

    Risks are actively discussed and managed in governance forums and aligned with the risk register. Ownership of risk and related activity is clear. Controls are effective.

    Off
  • Medium high

    There is a sufficient understanding and reporting of the material risks impacting the project.

    Off
  • Medium

    Risk management is a compliance activity. There is limited understanding and awareness of the key risks impacting the project.

    Off
  • Medium low

    There are significant risks and issues that are not adequately controlled or reported.

    Off
  • Low

    There is minimal understanding of the key risks, there are significant issues impacting project delivery and finger pointing on who is responsible.

    Off
    • Risks are actively discussed and managed in governance forums and aligned with the risk register. Ownership of risk and related activity is clear. Controls are effective.

    • There is a sufficient understanding and reporting of the material risks impacting the project.

    • Risk management is a compliance activity. There is limited understanding and awareness of the key risks impacting the project.

    • There are significant risks and issues that are not adequately controlled or reported.

    • There is minimal understanding of the key risks, there are significant issues impacting project delivery and finger pointing on who is responsible.

Connect with the digital community

Share, build or learn digital experience and skills with training and events, and collaborate with peers across government.