The Assessment has identified investments of $340.6 million since 2019-20 in development and transition to GovERP as outlined in Table 2.
| Source | Entity | Purpose | 2019-20 $ m | 2020-21 $ m | 2021-22 $ m | 2022-23 $ m | Total $m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 Budget (May 2021) (see note a) | Services Australia | To: (see note b) • Build GovERP technology platform • On-board entities to GovERP • Transition the SDO Provider Hubs • Program management | 126.4 | 119.7 | Services Australia total $246.1 | ||
| Department of Industry, Science Energy and Resources (DISER) | Business case development to develop SecondPass Business Cases for further adoption of GovERP and the design of suitable standardised technologies for small and medium entities | 2 | DISER total $2.0 | ||||
| Australian Taxation Office (ATO) | 3.3 | ATO total $3.3 | |||||
| Department of Finance | 2.5 | Department of Finance total | |||||
| Department of Finance | Onboarding readiness and legacy systems assist the SDO client entities to prepare for the transition to the GovERP platform, including the integration and decommission of legacy systems that result from onboarding to GovERP | 19.6 | $89.20 | ||||
| 2020-21 Budget (October 2020) | Department of Finance | To develop the GovERP model and Whole-of-government Business Case | 35.6 | ||||
| Modernisation Fund (August 2019) | Department of Finance | To progress a GovERP prototype | 31.5 | ||||
| Total | $340.60 |
Table source: Department of Finance, Additional Information Factsheet Shared Services Overview (incl GovERP), 15 May 2024.
Services Australia has advised that, of the $246.1 million allocated as its budget for GovERP, $198.15 million had been spent as of 31 December 2023 (Services Australia January 2024). The Minister for Government Services has subsequently advised (see Reference 2) that the remaining budget will be used to continue sustainment of the current ERP solution, including ongoing licensing and hosting costs of the platform, see Appendix D.
The Panel understand that 30 capabilities (out of 39 functional capabilities of the MVP 1.1) have been developed to date, with a subset of 18 of these capabilities having completed functional testing.
Development and functional testing have primarily focused on:
The Panel could not confirm through evidence that travel and expense management-related capabilities completed GovERP functional testing. However, a key vendor (8common) has advised that all build elements for the travel and expense management tool (Expense8; see Reference 3) have been completed and functionally tested, albeit not explicitly integrated as part of the MVP 1.1 GovERP solution.
Note: Figure 2 shows DTA analysis based on Appendix C, Reason Group technical assessment report.
The table above contains the following information:
• Learning management
• Leave and absence management
• Organisational management
• Performance and goals management
• Recruitment
• On-boarding
• Off-boarding
• Work time and attendance
• Time sheet recording and management
• Manager self-service
• Employ self-service
• Payroll services
• Asset accounting
• Cost management
• Funds management
• General ledger
• Project accounting
• Tax management
• Statutory reporting
• Management reporting
• Budgeting and planning
• Accounts receivable
• Banking and cash management
• Services procurement
• Purchasing
• Receipting
• Contractor management
• Contract management
• Supplier management
• Expense management
• Auditing and compliance
Components built-to-date were prioritised around the functionality required to onboard AGD (i.e. MVP1.1). There are some positive foundational features, however, existing capabilities are not sufficiently developed to address the MVP1.0 capabilities necessary for broader use across government.
As part of its terms of reference, the Panel was asked to advise on any remaining work envisaged to complete GOVERP. The Panel understands the following functional capabilities have not yet been developed and would require progression to complete the MVP1.1 (refer Appendix F):
The Panel notes that, while functional testing has been completed for some capabilities, no system integration testing or user acceptance testing appears to have occurred as part of activities to date. Such testing is critical to completion of trusted and operational ERP (see Reference 6). Services Australia has stated (Services Australia June 2024):
The Panel is mindful that progressing development of the capabilities identified in Section 3.3 for AGD’s deployment (i.e. MVP1.1) may not be sufficient to complete GovERP.
In correspondence of 26 April 2024, the Hon Bill Shorten MP advised, “The development of the current ERP solution had primarily focussed on meeting the Attorney-General’s Department’s requirements, which in its current form are not suitable to meet the expansive operational requirements of Services Australia.” (see Reference 8).
Considering Minister Shorten’s advice that the current ERP solution is not suitable to meeting Services Australia’s requirements, the Panel notes the 18 functional capabilities completed to date falls short of both the MVP1.1 (of 39 functional capabilities) and the MVP1.0 for whole-of-government purposes (54 functional capabilities). In this context, the objective of a standardised, common transactional corporate service will not be achieved by GovERP, even if it is further developed to carry out the remaining work to complete the MVP1.1.
Additionally, the underlying technical stack is no-longer current for GovERP’s financial and procurement-related capabilities, with a version change released in 2023. Updating to more current versions is necessary to ensure appropriate functionality, reduce ongoing out year maintenance, and to remain on the upgrade path.
Fully managed ERP services across the Commonwealth do not have a good record of performance. Generally, over the previous decade, only minimum support upgrades have been applied, and versions of SAP across the Commonwealth are at elevated levels of risk due to falling behind in the currency of the software.
OffThe above recommendation aligns with the new APS approach to shared services that is premised on principles of choice, market competition and affordability rather than focussing directly on GovERP.
The government’s Digital and ICT Reuse Policy is underpinned by three high-level requirements:
For the purposes of this Assessment, the concept of reuse has been applied broadly to capture as many reuse opportunities as possible. This includes consideration of opportunities to utilise existing technologies that have been built, all the way through to consideration of opportunities to leverage existing processes or patterns. As such, GovERP’s technical reusability has been considered across three tiers
Reuse hierarchy