Criterion 3 – Use the AGA to find reusable platforms and capabilities

Review the Australian Government Architecture (AGA)

Review the AGA website and familiarise yourself with the capabilities, services, policies and standards that are relevant to your new digital service:

  • use the AGA to identify existing platforms and capabilities that can support your service offering and meet your user needs. For example, you can search for capabilities related to identity and authentication, content management, or data analytics
  • contact the owners or managers of the platforms and capabilities that you are interested in reusing, and ask them about the availability, suitability, interoperability, costs, and onboarding process for their solutions.
Off
Benefits and drawbacks of reuse

Compare the benefits and drawbacks of reusing existing platforms and capabilities across government versus developing new ones. Consider factors such as: 

  • user experience
  • functionality
  • security
  • compliance
  • scalability
  • maintainability.
Off
Reusing existing platforms and capabilities

When reusing existing platforms and capabilities, work closely with the delivery partners to establish a collaborative and trusted relationship. 

To explore potential synergies or dependencies, engage with other agencies or delivery partners (criterion 5) that are responsible for or involved in these:

  • services
  • platforms
  • capabilities.
Off
Document your findings

Document your findings and recommendations on how to apply criterion 3.

  • provide evidence to support your decisions and show how you have used the AGA to find reusable platforms and capabilities for your service offering
  • evidence such as user research, cost-benefit analysis, or risk assessment can be used
  • use the Digital Investment Overview (DIO) Data Collection form to report on how you have met the criterion.
  • use the Digital Capability Assessment Process (DCAP) template to report on how you have met the criterion.
     
Off

Suggested activities to apply this criterion

Understand available capabilities and services available for reuse 

Use the AGA: Review the AGA early in the design of the service to understand what is available to you.  

Avoid unnecessary investment: Consider the capabilities available through existing portals and leverage existing government investment. Use existing whole-of-government resources and guidance to help build an understanding of what platforms and capabilities are available.

Connect and assess: Assess how well the existing capabilities align with the service’s requirements and objectives (Criterion 1). Engage other agencies to gain insights on ways to promote, use or plan for future reuse. 

Identify and apply any applicable whole-of-government requirements and policies  

Know what’s required: Use the AGA to determine what requirements and policies apply to the service. Consider how to apply these across the service to enhance the user’s experience and support compliance.

Document how reuse has been considered in your decisions 

Compare your needs with existing capabilities: Clearly demonstrate how reuse has been applied in the decision-making process by documenting how the needs of the service compare with what existing platforms offer in terms of user experience, cost and efficiency.

Criterion 4 – Follow the decision-making framework

Criterion 4 – Follow the decision-making framework

Apply the relevant decision-making framework
  • Use the decision-making framework relevant to the service: Assess the service against the decision-making framework to understand if reusing existing platforms and capabilities is beneficial to users.
  • Know your user context: Understand if users are accessing the new service as a private individual, as a representative of a business, as a representative of a service provider, or a combination of these.
  • Understand if it is cost effective: Determine if using an existing access point is not prohibitive on the basis of investment required, and if the cost of using the existing portal is outweighed by the benefits. For example, Investment to uplift an existing portal is outweighed by a significantly better experience for users.
  • Consider how to overcome barriers: Consider if there are any challenges making the new service available through an existing point. For example, could there be technical issues interfacing with legacy internal systems or legal barriers such as data sharing. Consider, where appropriate, using mechanisms such as the Data Availability and Transparency Act (DATA) scheme to support ethical data sharing.
Off
When to apply

Apply Criterion 4 during the Discovery phase to help consider capabilities and services available to improve user experience and promote reuse.

This criterion requires agencies to apply and follow a set of decision-making principles to determine where a new service is best placed within the existing landscape of government digital services. The decision-making framework will apply based on the users of the new digital service:

  • citizen-facing services (for individuals)
  • business and provider-facing services.
Off
Question for consideration
  • Are users accessing the new service as a private individual, as a representative of a business, as a representative of a service provider, or a combination of these roles?
Off

Guidance to follow the decision-making framework

Next page: Criterion 5 – Engage with delivery partners

Services covered by the Digital Inclusion Standard

The Inclusion Standard is mandatory and applies from 1 January 2025 to informational and transactional digital services that are: 

Informational services

Informational services provide information to users, such as reports, fact sheets or videos. They may include: 

  • government agency websites
  • smart answers and virtual assistants
  • e-learning
  • publications
  • online libraries
  • databases and data warehouses. 
     
Off
Transactional services

Transactional services lead to a change in government-held records, typically involving an exchange of information, money, licences or goods.  

Examples of transactional services include: 

  • logging in to a portal or platform
  • submitting a claim
  • registering a business
  • updating contact details
  • lodging a tax return
  • subscribing to newsletters
  • grant applications
  • public consultation submissions. 
     
Off
Staff-facing services

Staff facing services provide information to government employees or support employee transactions. They may include: 

  • intranets
  • learning management systems
  • records management systems
  • case/client management systems
  • decision-making systems
  • any systems or platforms utilised by staff. 

For more information on how ‘portals’ are defined, please refer to the Australian Government Architecture (AGA).

Off

Digital experience 

Digital experiences are the interactions and engagements a user has with a digital service, including its usability, design and the overall user satisfaction.

Digital inclusion 

Digital inclusion is the capability of individuals or groups to enjoy the benefits of being online and using technology confidently to improve their day-to-day lives. (See What is Digital Inclusion? for more information.)

Services not covered by the Digital Inclusion Standard

The Digital Inclusion Standard does not apply to:

  • corporate Commonwealth entities  
  • state, territory or local government services
  • personal ministerial websites that contain a minister’s political activities or views on issues not related to their ministerial role.

Services not covered by the Digital Inclusion Standard, such as existing staff-facing services, may choose to apply the Digital Inclusion Standard to improve their digital services.  

Some services may request an exemption from the Digital Inclusion Standard. See the Exemptions section below.  

Next page: Meeting the Digital Inclusion Standard

Connect with the digital community

Share, build or learn digital experience and skills with training and events, and collaborate with peers across government.