• Appendices

  • Independent GovERP Reuse Assessment Appendices

  • Appendix A: Terms of reference

    Appendix A: Terms of reference 

    Context 

    New APS ERP approach 

    On 28 November 2023, the Finance Minister, Senator the Hon Katy Gallagher, announced the new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) approach for the Australian Public Service (APS) that replaces the Shared Services Transformation Program. This new approach sets the strategic direction for APS ERP system management, which is underpinned by the principles of choice, market competition, and affordability. As part of the announcement, an independent assessment (the Assessment) will evaluate the suitability of Services Australia

    ERP (GovERP) use by Services Australia, and reuse by Commonwealth entities to support Commonwealth entities to implement future cost-effective ERP uplifts. 

    Independent Reuse Assessment 

    The Assessment will be led by an independent eminent person(s), with support from a Secretariat with expertise drawn from the DTA, and experts from across the APS and the private sector, to evaluate work undertaken to date to deliver GOVERP. 

    Term 

    The Assessment will be completed by 30 June 2024

    Objectives 

    The Assessment will focus on the following areas to leverage work already completed, draw out lessons learned, and uncover opportunities for reuse of GOVERP to support the new APS ERP approach. The objectives of the Assessment are to: 

    1. Evaluate and understand what has been delivered to date. 
    2. Evaluate and understand what has been spent to date against what has been delivered. 
    3. Evaluate and understand the suitability of delivered outputs for reuse across the Commonwealth. 
    4. Contribute standard designs, patterns and other related guidance to the Australian Government Architecture. 
    5. Articulate recommendations and guidance for reuse including information that will support entities to plan future ERP uplifts. 
    6. Advise on potential costs, risks, and associated benefits, to carry out any remaining work envisaged by Services Australia to complete GovERP. 
    7. Advise on potential ongoing costs to entities from reusing GovERP, if reuse can be supported. 
    8. Identify alternative designs and pathways that might provide more cost-effective options for any remaining work. 
    9. Identify any existing ‘readymade’ deployment configurations deemed suitable to allow direct onboarding of entities. 

    Deliverables 

    The Assessment will produce a report, and where relevant, industry standard reference materials that will be made available through the Australian Government Architecture. A draft report will be provided to the Minister by 31 May 2024 with the final report provided by 30 June 2024. Secretaries Data and Digital, and the Digital Leaders, Committees will be provided progressive updates on the Assessment. 

    Summary of how terms of reference have been addressed in this report 
     TORRelated Report Section 
    1. Evaluate and understand what has been delivered to date. Section 3.2 Delivery to date 
    2. Evaluate and understand what has been spent to date against what has been delivered. Section 3.1 Expenditure to date 
    3. Evaluate and understand the suitability of delivered outputs for reuse across the Commonwealth. Section 4 Reuse assessment 
    4. Contribute standard designs, patterns and other related guidance to the Australian Government Architecture. Reusable business process maps, designs, patterns, and related documentation have been identified as potential Australia Government Architecture contributions. 
    5. Articulate recommendations and guidance for reuse including information that will support entities to plan future ERP uplifts. Section 1.1 Summary of recommendations 
    6. Advise on potential costs, risks, and associated benefits, to carry out any remaining work envisaged by Services Australia to complete GovERP. Section 3.3 Remaining work to complete GovERP 
    7. Advise on potential ongoing costs to entities from reusing GovERP, if reuse can be supported. Section 4.2 Potential ongoing reuse costs to entities   
    8. Identify alternative designs and pathways that might provide more cost-effective options for any remaining work. Section 5 Alternate designs or delivery pathways   
    9. Identify any existing ‘readymade’ deployment configurations deemed suitable to allow direct onboarding of entities. Section 4.1 Reusability by tier (4.1.1 Tier 1 reuse opportunities) 
    Off
  • Appendix B: Eminent Panel biographies

    Appendix B:  Eminent Panel biographies 

    Ms Maile Carnegie 

    Portrait image of Ms Maile Carnegie

    Maile is Group Executive Australia Retail, ANZ’s largest business which serves around five million retail customers through an extensive network of branches, ATMs and leading online and mobile banking applications and digital solutions. Since joining ANZ, she has been developing enterprise-wide digital capability, including 

    the transformation of the Australia Business which aims to improve the financial wellbeing of ANZ customers. Maile also holds Group accountability for design and marketing which includes ANZ’s brand, advertising and sponsorships. She is a Non-Executive Director on the Board of ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited. 

    Maile is keenly focused on customer centric innovation and design. She joined ANZ in 2016 from Google where she was Managing Director Australia and New Zealand. She also spent over 20 years with Proctor and Gamble in roles including Managing Director Australia and New Zealand, General Manager for Asia Strategy, Marketing and Design based in Singapore and a number of senior commercial roles in the United States. 

    With a passion for helping future generations, Maile contributed as one of six members on the independent review of the Australian Public Service, was previously Vice-Chair of the ASIC External Advisory Panel and a board member of Innovation and Science Australia. She is currently a member of the Board at University of Technology, Sydney and a Trustee of the Australian Museum. 

    Maile holds a degree in Business Administration in Finance, Economics and Marketing from the University of Technology Sydney. 

    Ms Catherine D’Elia 

    Portrait image of Ms Catherine D'Elia

    Catherine is a senior executive with an excellent track record in leading people centred, innovative, strategic, service-oriented solutions, leveraging technology, transforming culture and streamlining processes across geographies. 

    With a strong background in strategic leadership, large scale change management, executive level collaboration, Catherine has a proven track record in fostering a positive work environment, complex problem resolution, and internal and external relationship management. 

    Catherine has held senior positions in the NSW public service for the last 16 years, including as a Deputy Secretary in the Department of Communities and Justice Department. Prior to joining the public service, Catherine held senior positions in the banking sector at NAB and Citizens Bank in the US. 

    Catherine holds a Masters in Education, Human Resource Development from Boston University, as well as a Bachelor of Arts in International Relations from the University of New Hampshire. 

    Mr Chris Cawood 

    Portrait image of Mr Chris Cawood

    Chris has over 30 years’ leadership and technical experience across heavy industry sectors including manufacturing, oil and gas, mining and transport. 

    Chris joined Ixom in late 2021 and was previously the Chief 

    Information Officer of OceanaGold for eight years. Prior to this he had an extensive career with BHP, where he held CIO roles in various business units. 

    Chris developed a passion for technology transformation and change in his early career in the BHP Steel (now BlueScope) marketing team. From there, he progressed into leadership roles with the BHP Petroleum division in Western Australia and for five years was involved in the expansion of its oil and gas assets. He was appointed to CIO roles in the coal and marketing divisions of BHP and was responsible for large technology transformation projects as well as a number of M&A integrations and divestments. 

    Chris has significant experience working in multicultural environments and with diverse teams. He has lived in Europe and worked closely with colleagues and external stakeholders in Pakistan, Japan, China, Africa, Singapore, The Philippines and North America. 

    Chris holds a Bachelor of Science and Education degree from Melbourne University. 

    Mr Chris Fechner 

    Portrait image of Mr Chris Fechner

    Chris Fechner was appointed the Chief Executive Officer at the Digital Transformation Agency on 13 October 2021. 

    Chris is also the Head of the Digital Profession; he started his two-year term in January 2023. 

    Chris has extensive experience in state government 

    services, focusing on large scale digital and ICT reform and transformation programs as well as implementing contemporary investment, contestability, and governance frameworks. 

    Before joining the Australian Public Service, Chris was the Queensland Government Chief 

    Customer and Digital Officer throughout 2020 and 2021. Chris was previously the Chief Digital and Product Officer at Service NSW. Prior to that, Chris held a number of senior positions across the NSW and Queensland governments as well as in freight and rail organisations. 

    Chris holds an Executive Masters of Business Administration and a Bachelor of Applied Science and Computing, both from the Queensland University of Technology. 

    As CEO, Chris is responsible for leading the agency to ensure we deliver on the government’s digital transformation agenda, in accordance with our agency’s executive order and the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013

    Off
  • Appendix C: Technical assessment report

    Appendix C: Technical assessment report 

    Appendix C can be found on digital.gov.au together with this Eminent Panel report.

    There is also a download link for a PDF on the Enterprise Resource Planning landing page.

    Off
  • Appendix D: Stakeholders engaged

    Appendix D: Stakeholders engaged 

    ERP Consultative Committee member entities:

    • ACT Government 
    • Attorney-General’s Department 
    • Australian Bureau of Statistics 
    • Australian Taxation Office 
    • Department of Defence 
    • Department of Employment and Workplace Relations 
    • Department of Finance 
    • Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 
    • Department of Health and Aged Care
    • Department of Home Affairs
    • Services Australia.

    Note: These entities were also represented in the Assessment’s interviews and working group.

    Off
  • Appendix E: Key reuse assessment-related correspondence (Image version)

    Appendix E: Key reuse assessment-related correspondence

    Correspondence from DTA CEO to Services Australia CEO, 20 May 2024 sharing preliminary observations and insights of the Assessment 

    Page one of correspondence from the Minister for Government Services to the Minister for Finance, 26 April 2024 providing an update on the GovERP program. Full text is available in Accessible Appendix E
    Page two of correspondence from the Minister for Government Services to the Minister for Finance, 26 April 2024 providing an update on the GovERP program. Full text is available in Accessible Appendix E

    Correspondence from the Minister for Government Services to the Minister for Finance, 26 April 2024 providing an update on the GovERP program 

    Page one of correspondence from the Minister for Government Services to the Minister for Finance, 26 April 2024 providing an update on the GovERP program
    Page two of correspondence from the Minister for Government Services to the Minister for Finance, 26 April 2024 providing an update on the GovERP program
    Off
  • Appendix F: MVP capabilities for GovERP (Image version)

    Appendix F: MVP capabilities for GovERP 

    This image shows the five functional capabilities and their current level of development. For a text version of this image, please navigate to 'Accessible Appendix F'.
    Shared Services Steering Committee-agreed MVP 1.0 capabilities for whole-of-government purposes 

    The above table is a list of capabilities grouped by value stream. 

    Within this set of capabilities, a scope for initial delivery (MVP) and target state were both defined, as reflected in the blue and purple respectively. Capabilities marked with a star are those Extended Capabilities that were to be considered for inclusion in the scope of Shared Services. 

    This image shows a range of Australia-developed functionalities and their current level of development. For a text version of this image, please navigate to 'Accessible Appendix F'.
    Services Australia-developed MVP1.1 functional capabilities 

    A brief description of each of the MVP1.1 functional capabilities is below. 

    Capability Description 
    Hire to Retire (H2R)
    Learning management This capability relates to administration, documentation, tracking, reporting, and delivery of educational courses, training programs, or learning and development initiatives within an entity 
    Leave and absence management Processes and systems used by an entity to manage employee time off, including vacation, sick leave, and other types of absences 
    Organisational management Process of planning, coordinating, and overseeing the various functions and operations within an entity 
    Performance and goals management Setting, tracking, and evaluating employee performance against established goals and objectives 
    Recruitment  Process of identifying and attracting candidates to fill job vacancies within the entity including the entire hiring process, from inception to the individual recruit's integration into the entity 
    On-boarding  Integration of new employees into an entity   
    Off-boarding  The process of managing the departure of an employee from an entity 
    Work time and attendance Systems used by entities of all sizes, across the APS, to ensure accuracy of employee's time and attendance, pay and absence requests 
    Time sheet recording and management Tracking and managing employee work hours and attendance 
    Capability Description 
    Manager self service Enables managers to access personnel data for their direct reports, such as leave, time-off, performance, and learning information. 
    Employee self service System that supports employees to access and manage their own personal and employment-related information 
    Payroll services Administration of an entity's employee's financial records including salaries, wages, bonuses, deductions, and net pay 
    Employee management Processes, systems, and practices used by an entity to manage its workforce 
    Budget to Report (B2R) 
    Asset accounting Sub-ledger that records the financial transactions related to an entities’ assets 
    Cost management Planning, estimating, budgeting, and controlling costs in a project or business operation 
    Funds management Managing and overseeing the financial resources of an entity 
    General ledger Complete record of all financial transactions over the life of an entity 
    Project accounting Financial transactions related to managing a project including costs, billing, and revenue 
    Tax management Management of an entity’s tax obligations to ensure Australian tax laws and regulations compliance 
    Statutory reporting The mandatory submission of financial and non-financial information by an entity to the australian government or regulatory bodies 

    Management  

    reporting 

    Provision of information to managers, to assist with informed decisions including tracking progress or KPI’s, identifying trends, and highlighting areas that may require attention or improvement 
    Budgeting and planning The process of creating a detailed financial plan for an entities’ future expenses and revenues 

    Commonwealth  

    reporting 

    Mandatory reporting requirements for Australian Government entities to prepare and submit financial statements, performance reports, and other information to the government in accordance with relevant legislation and accounting standards 
    Lease accounting The accounting treatment of leases, which are contractual agreements between a lessee and a lessor for the use of an asset 
    Revenue to Bank (R2B) 
    Accounts receivable Funds that customers owe for products or services that have been invoiced 
    Banking and cash management The operational and banking processes associated with the collection, aggregation, holding and disbursement of cash 
    Procure to Pay (P2) 
    Service procurement The process of acquiring services from vendors including preparing RFTs/RFQs, managing purchasing and contract lifecycles, sourcing, requisition, order processing, payments and reporting 
    Purchasing  Purchase of goods and/or services by an entity 
    Capability Description 
    Receipting The process of recording and acknowledging the receipt of goods, services, or payments 
    Contractor management Management of the relationship between an entity and its contractors 
    Contract management Process of managing legally binding agreements including creation and negotiation, contract execution, contract compliance monitoring and renewal or close out 
    Accounts payable Money owed by the entity to its vendors 

    Report procurement 

    activities  

    Reports showing procurement activities, costings and purchasing information regarding goods and/or services 
    e-Procurement  Use of electronic methods to conduct transactions between buyers and suppliers 
    Whole-ofgovernment central purchasing Whole-of-government procurement designed for permission-based services as permits, accreditations, licenses, and registrations 

    Supplier 

    management  

    Task ensuring suppliers meet the expectations of their contract 
    Sourcing Process of locating products or services outside the entity 
    Travel and Expense Management (TEMs) 
    Expense management Bookkeeping system for controlling, tracking, and processing employee expense reimbursements 
    Auditing and compliance management Measurement of an entity’s adherence to rules and regulations, standards, and any relevant internal bylaws and codes of conduct 

    Credit card 

    management  

    Employee-related corporate credit card transactions 

    Travel 

    management  

    System used by entities to oversee and facilitate business travel 
    Off
  • 2. Introduction

    2.1 Purpose

    This Reuse Assessment Review report is an independent assessment of the Australian Government ERP ecosystem, GovERP.

    Taking into account what has been built as part of MVP 1.1 in preparing to onboard the Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) and the full scope of the ERP requirements of Commonwealth entities (MVP1.0), the assessment provides evidence upon which to assess the reuse potential of the GovERP solution and the ability to implement the Hire to Retire (H2R), Budget to Report (B2R), Revenue to Bank (R2B), Procure-to-Pay (P2P) and Travel and Expense Management (TEMS) value streams.

    The report provides:

    • an assessment of the completeness and maturity of the GovERP system. Where Services Australia GovERP development is incomplete or ongoing, an assessment of what capabilities are outstanding and the schedule for their delivery.
    • consideration of the feasibility of incomplete parts to provide an understanding of how long it would take other Commonwealth entities to use the capability.
    • capabilities, functions and/or modules that meet the reuse principles and why.
    • capabilities, functions and/or modules that do not meet reuse principles and why.
    • expert insights that assist the DTA to provide recommendations to improve the reuse potential of the capabilities, functions and/or modules that do not meet the reuse requirements.

    2.2 Scope

    2.2.1 In scope

    This report includes the following:

    • a catalogue of business functions that the GovERP provides, and a mapping of alignment between these capabilities and the underlying and supporting IT infrastructure (software and hardware), including any modules or extensions with GovERP.
    • GovERP solution’s value streams, Hire to Retire, Revenue to Bank, Budget to Report, Procure to Pay, and Travel and Expense Management.
    • functional diagrams, at the application and infrastructure levels, of the GovERP system.
    • evaluation of environments, systems, processes, GovERP configuration, design data, and IT architecture artefacts (e.g. business catalogues, interfaces, APIs, and SAP core function customisations).
    • all components of the GovERP system, including Application Programming Interfaces
      (APIs) and other connection points with external systems.
    • implementation considerations for other entities when exploring GovERP’s potential reuse.
    • evaluating the build and implementation status of GovERP, including readiness for reusing existing environments, systems, processes, and data (standards and integration).
    • identifying elements of GovERP that could potentially be reused, including any limitations which may be applicable.
    • outlining how other Australian Government entities can reuse GovERP for their needs.
    • offering insights into GovERP’s reuse potential and specific implementation pathways for other Australian Government entities.

    2.2.2 Out of scope

    This report does not cover:

    • assessment of GovERP’s scope or the validity of the original business case, or other elements of the GovERP Program beyond the technology focus of this report e.g. appropriateness of the scope of the MVP.
    • analysis of the program’s performance or factors leading to the GovERP Program’s pause.
    • the following value streams:
      • Prepare to Adopt (P2A) as this relates only to change management and the implementation of GovERP, and as such no technologies were designed or built which could be considered for reuse.
      • Enquire to Resolve (E2R), as this is focused on IT Service Management, rather than a functional build of the ERP solution.
    • comparison of existing entity business processes with those in GovERP.
    • mapping of GovERP architecture to existing entity architecture.
    • detailed costings related to implementation, as these depend on agency-specific factors (e.g. the approach to be taken, the maturity of the capability and the existing workforce capabilities).
    • consideration of any customisation / configuration or data migration requirements.

    2.3 Relevant artefacts

    The report refers to the following government artefacts:

    • Digital and ICT Reuse Policy: Sets out requirements for entities to consider and enable reuse in digital and ICT capabilities.
    • Australian Government Architecture (AGA): Provides guidance on aligning solutions with government’s digital direction.
    • Other frameworks relevant to GovERP’s capabilities or products: Secure Cloud Policy, Hosting Certification Framework, Protective Security Policy Framework, Essential Eight, Digital Service Standard.

    2.4 Reuse assessment approach

    2.4.1 Approach

    The approach developed to undertake the reuse assessment is outlined in the figure below.

    A figure showing the approach phases that the assessment underwent. A full description of this image is available in 'Figure 1 image description' below.
    Figure 1: Approach phases
  • Figure 3 image description

    Figure 3: Reuse hierarchy

    1. Use of what is already built
      1. Full Copy Shared Service Portal Access
    2. Building on something that exists
      1. Separate instance
      2. Limited Customisation & Configuration
    3. Repository
      1. Learnings & Thought Leadership
      2. Business Capability & Processes
      3. Designs, Blueprints & Patterns
    Off
  • 2.4.4 How to reuse

    This phase outlines the pragmatic considerations for reuse, including:

    • residual build requirements
    • implementation options, timeframes, and potential costs
    • commercial considerations
    • technical considerations (functionality, compatibility, integration, interoperability, adaptability, scalability, performance, and flexibility)
    • security, data, and storage considerations
    • governance
    • ongoing maintenance and support.

    All these factors are collectively assessed to determine the viability of reuse.

    References

    1. Per Decision 12 of the Decision Framework Briefing Outcomes of SSSC [Shared Services Sub-Committee], page 91.
    2. Build and test information reported by Services Australia was based on the MVP1.1 template.
    3. Changes made, grouped into Workflows, Report, Interfaces, Conversions, Enhancements, Forms – see Appendix G: Terms and definitions.
  • 3. GovERP Overview

    3.1 Initiation and intent

    The whole of government Shared Services Program, led by the Department of Finance, commenced in 2014 with approval from the Secretaries Board.

    The enabling technology for the Shared Services Program, GovERP, began in 2017 when the Department of Finance undertook a Request for Proposal for a whole of government ERP. The GovERP Program aimed to consolidate and standardise common transactional corporate Australian Public Service (APS) processes and services aiming for cost-effectiveness, scalability, and advancing the one-APS vision while enhancing Australia’s digital capability. 

    In contributing to the government’s digital transformation, GovERP was intended to improve day-to-day operations within government departments, facilitating smoother interactions between entities, thus streamlining the access to (and consumption of) corporate services within the APS. This intended future state is illustrated in Figure 4 below.

    The figure shows the intended future state of uplifting an agency's enterprise resource planning from their current to future state into GovERP. A full description of this image is available in 'Figure 4 image description' below.
    Figure 4: GovERP current to future state (see Reference 1)
  • 4. Summary of delivered product

    4.1 Overview

    The current GovERP solution serves as an initial framework aimed at establishing the groundwork for future enhancements and deployments. The current solution was paused mid-flight in November 2023, and hence a number of capabilities are still under development, and all testing
    was not completed.

    Figure 9 provides an overview of the build completeness of the MVP1.1 build in terms of both value stream and functional capability.

    The figure describes the completeness of each capability by value stream. A complete description can be found in the 'Figure 9 image description' section below.
    Figure 9: Value stream build completeness
  • Accessible Appendix E (Text version)

    Accessible Appendix E: Key reuse assessment-related correspondence

    Correspondence from DTA CEO to Services Australia CEO, 20 May 2024 sharing preliminary observations and insights of the Assessment 

    This letter appears on Digital Transformation Agency letterhead and comes from the CEO.

    Dear Mr Hazlehurst,

    RE: Services Australia ERP (formerly GovERP Reuse Assessment)

    I am writing to provide an update on progress and preliminary observations of the Reuse Assessment currently being undertaken by the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA). 

    Reason Group Pty Ltd has been engaged as ERP specialists to develop a technical assessment of potential reuse opportunities. The draft technical assessment has been shared with Services Australia to ensure its accuracy, prior to consideration by the independent Panel of Eminent People. While the technical assessment is still in draft form, I would like to share preliminary observations and insights to keep you informed of progress.

    The technical assessment considers potential reuse opportunities across three tiers:

    1. reuse of what Services Australia has already built by fully adopting all components
    2. building on something that exists by adapting a copy of the project as an accelerator for individual agencies' use
    3. a repository, such as learning and business processes.

    The initial observations suggest substantial components of GovERP have been developed, however sufficient testing has not been undertaken on many of the components to enable confidence of reuse as 'Tier 1' opportunities. Further, it appears many GovERP components prioritised requirements of the Attorney General's Department (AGD) and, at the time of the program pause, were understandably not progressed to the level required for broader whole-of-government use.

    Observations, as at 15 May 2024, indicate:

    • of the 39 ERP functional capabilities scoped as a minimum viable product for AGD, 30 capabilities have been developed with a subset of these capabilities (18, or 46%) having completed functional testing.
    • 69% of human capability management and 62% of financial management related capabilities have completed testing.
    • limited to no procurement-related and travel and expense management-related capabilities have been developed or tested (noting assessment is ongoing for these).

    Initial analysis suggests cross-government Tier 1 reuse opportunities may be further limited from a commercial perspective for smaller agencies with less complex needs, particularly when considering 'choice' under the new APS ERP arrangements. Reusability could be appropriate for a specific implementation, or for a larger agency with more complex ERP needs such as Services Australia; I understand consideration of this is ongoing.

    The assessment is likely to establish some reuse opportunities as potential accelerators or learnings for agencies ('Tier 2' and 'Tier 3' opportunities). Ideally, any reusable content from the Services Australia ERP can also be leveraged through the Australian Government Architecture. Examples of potential 'Tier 2' and 'Tier 3' reuse opportunities include:

    • the Travel and Expense Management tool, Expense8, which is currently used by approximately 40 entities
    • SAP Signavio, which houses a range of process maps and may be able to be utilised for other entity ERP developments.

    Finally, it is fair to say that the evolving view will indicate that Tier 1 use of GovERP would be most likely to relate to implementation within your agency and possibly (but not confidently yet) to your connected agencies to which you currently provide services.

    In this context, I look forward to continuing collaboration with you and your staff to support the new APS ERP approach. I would be happy to discuss the Reuse Assessment's observations and insights at your convenience, including the Eminent Panel’s potential findings and recommendations.

    Kind regards

    Chris Fechner

    20 May 2024

     

    Correspondence from the Minister for Government Services to the Minister for Finance, 26 April 2024 providing an update on the GovERP program 

    This letter appears on The Hon Bill Shorten MP's letterhead

    The address on this letter reflects that it is written to Senator the Hon Katy Gallagher

    Dear Minister

    I am writing to provide an update on the Government Enterprise Resource Planning (GovERP) Programme, now known as Services Australia ERP (SA ERP).
    Since your announcement on 28 November 2023, the Attorney-General’s Department, the only agency that agreed to onboard to the ERP solution in 2024, advised it no longer intends to onboard and requested any system-related activities cease. The Attorney-General’s Department is exploring alternative solutions to meet its requirements and budget.

    The ERP solution was originally conceived and costed to service the Australian Government’s first of six shared services hubs which provided economies of scale that are no longer applicable. The establishment and onboarding of Services Australia’s shared services hub was not scheduled until a later phase of the project. The development of the current ERP solution had primarily focussed on meeting the Attorney-General’s Department’s requirements, which in its current form are not suitable to meet the expansive operational requirements of Services Australia.

    The mid 2023–2024 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) process agreed that the Digital Transformation Agency would undertake an independent re-use assessment of the ERP solution, with any future requirements to be considered as part of the 2024–25 MYEFO process.

    On this basis, Services Australia has refocused efforts to determine the functional requirements of the ERP solution for Services Australia.

    In February 2023, you agreed to reprofile $60 million of Services Australia’s original GovERP budget allocation to the 2023–24 financial year. As at 31 March 024, the Programme has spent $38.2 million of the Agency’s 2023-24 budget. The remaining budget will be used to continue sustainment of the current ERP solution, including ongoing licencing and hosting costs of the platform.

    Yours sincerely
    Bill Shorten
    26 April 2024
     

    Off
  • Accessible Appendix F (Text version)

    Appendix F: MVP capabilities for GovERP 

    Shared Services Steering Committee-agreed MVP 1.0 capabilities for whole-of-government purposes 

    The table above contains the following information:

    1. Hire to retire
    Developed and functionally tested

    •    Learning management
    •    Leave and absence management
    •    Organisational management
    •    Performance and goals management
    •    Recruitment
    •    On-boarding
    •    Off-boarding
    •    Work time and attendance
    •    Time sheet recording and management

    Developed, but functional testing not yet passed

    •    Manager self-service
    •    Employ self-service
    •    Payroll services

    2. Budget to report
    Developed and functionally tested

    •    Asset accounting
    •    Cost management
    •    Funds management
    •    General ledger
    •    Project accounting
    •    Tax management
    •    Statutory reporting
    •    Management reporting

    Developed, but functional testing not yet passed

    •    Budgeting and planning

    3. Revenue to bank
    Developed, but functional testing not yet passed

    •    Accounts receivable
    •    Banking and cash management

    4. Procure to pay
    Developed and functionally tested

    •    Services procurement

    Developed, but functional testing not yet passed

    •    Purchasing
    •    Receipting
    •    Contractor management
    •    Contract management

    4a. Target capability built in procure to pay
    Developed and functionally tested

    •    Supplier management

    Developed, but functional testing not yet passed
    • Sourcing
    5. Travel & expense
    Developed, but functional testing not yet passed

    •    Expense management
    •    Auditing and compliance

     

    Services Australia-developed MVP1.1 functional capabilities 

    A complex diagram showing Services Australia-developed MVP1.1 functional capabilities. There are four main areas: service, functional, governance and enabling. These categories are then split into subcategories, which have a number of capabilities. These capabilities are then identified as either

    1. Developed and functionally tested, which has been shortened to ‘developed’
    2. Developed, but functional testing not yet, which has been shortened to ‘not tested’
    3. Not developed/partially developed, which has been shortened to ‘not complete’

    The contents of the diagram follow as a list. Each of the four main areas is divided into its subcategories, which then list the individual capabilities and their current status.

    The diagram also shows two capabilities as ‘Target capability’ built. These are supplier management and sourcing in procurement under ‘Functional’ capabilities.

     

    Service

    User interaction
    • Self Service – not complete
    • Service Desk – not complete
    • Accessibility Technology – not complete
    • Portal – not complete
    • Mobile – not complete 
    Service hub
    • Charge Back & Billing Management – not complete
    • Onboarding / Off-boarding – not complete
    • Relationship Management – not complete
    • Hub service management – not complete
    • Change management – not complete
    IT service management
    • Request Management – not complete
    • Incident / Problem Management – developed
    • Service Level Management – developed
    • Change & Release Management – not complete
    • Configuration Management – developed
    • End User Support – not complete

    Functional

    Human Resources
    • Manager Self-Service – not tested
    • Employee Self-Service – not tested
    • Leave and Absence Management – developed
    • Time Sheet Recording & Management – developed
    • Organisational Management – developed
    • Employee Management – not complete
    • Payroll Services – not tested
    • On-boarding – developed
    • Off-boarding – developed
    • Learning Management – developed
    • Recruitment – developed
    • Performance & Goals – developed
    • Work Time & Attendance – developed
    Finance
    • Accounts Receivable – not tested
    • Banking and Cash Management – not tested
    • Accounts Payable – not complete
    • Cost Management – developed
    • Lease accounting – not complete
    • General Ledger – developed
    • Budgeting & Planning – not tested
    • Funds Management – developed
    • Asset accounting – developed
    • Project accounting – developed
    • Tax management – developed
    • Commonwealth reporting – not complete
    • Statutory reporting – developed
    • Management reporting – developed
    Expense
    • Expense Management – not tested
    • Auditing and Compliance – not tested
    • Credit Card Management – not complete
    Travel
    • Travel Management – not complete
    Procurement
    • Purchasing – not tested
    • Report Procurement activities – not complete
    • Contractor management – not tested
    • eProcurement – not complete
    • Contract Management – not tested
    • Supplier Management – developed
    • Whole-of-government central purchasing – not complete
    • Receipting – not tested
    • Services procurement – developed
    • Sourcing – not tested

    Governance

    Governance, Risk and Compliance
    • Audit Management – not complete
    • Enterprise Risk Management – not complete
    • Controls & Compliance Management – not complete
    • Information Governance – not complete
    • Enterprise Architecture – not complete
    • Fraud Management – not complete
    • Policy Lifecycle Management – not complete
    • Data Privacy Governance – not complete 
    • Security Risk Management – not complete
    • Consultation – not complete

    Enabling

    Reporting, Analytics and Data
    • Statutory Reporting – not complete 
    • Master Data Management – not complete
    • Legacy Data Management – not complete
    • Operational Reporting –– not complete
    • Document Management – not tested
    • Self Service Analytics – not complete
    • Data Visualisation – not complete
    • Data Migration – not tested
    Security
    • User Identity and Access Management – not complete
    • Authentication – not complete
    • Access monitoring – not complete
    • Security Audit & Compliance – not complete
    • Data Security – not complete
    • Data Protection – not complete
    • Cyber Security Operations Centre (SOC) – not complete
    • Security Incident & Event Management – not complete
    Application, Platform and Infrastructure
    • Application Lifecycle Management – not complete
    • Integration Management – not complete
    • IT Infrastructure Management – not complete
    • Logging – not complete
    • Accessibility – not complete
    • Process Management – not complete
    • Extensibility – not complete
    • Print and Interactive Forms – not complete 
    • Monitoring – not complete
    • Database Management Systems – not complete
    • Developer Support – not complete
    • Portals – not complete
    • Secure Access Gateway – not complete
    • Disaster Recovery – not complete
    • Backup and Redundancy – not complete
    • Mobility Support – not complete
    • Testing Services – not complete
    • Notification Services – not complete
    Intelligence
    • Enterprise Automation – not complete
    • Data driven Insights – not complete
    Off

Connect with the digital community

Share, build or learn digital experience and skills with training and events, and collaborate with peers across government.