Checklist for independent assessors

Purpose

This checklist supports independent assessors to verify high-level alignment with the Digital Experience Policy and associated standards during assurance activities. It helps assessors understand if their digital projects appropriately consider and implement user-centered, accessible, inclusive and high-performing digital services.

Digital Service Standard

What to look for

  • The service is designed around clear user needs, informed by user research and testing.
  • Accessibility, interoperability, and user safety are embedded from the outset.
  • A plan is in place for ongoing monitoring and iterative improvements.
  • The service demonstrates commitment to continuous user-focused refinement across its lifecycle.

Checklist

  • User research has been or will be undertaken and applied to inform service design
  • The service clearly defines its objective and user need
  • There is a plan for monitoring and improving the service post-launch
  • The service design demonstrates or will demonstrate accessibility and security considerations

Digital Inclusion Standard

What to look for

  • The service is designed to be inclusive, accessible, and usable by diverse users, including those with low digital ability.
  • The design supports clear, simple, and user-friendly interfaces.
  • Responsive and adaptable design principles are applied to ensure flexibility across devices and contexts.
  • Privacy and data protection are prioritised to maintain trust and confidence.

Checklist

  • Inclusivity and accessibility have been considered and demonstrated in the service
  • Clear user support mechanisms or resources are in place
  • The design accommodates different user needs, abilities, and devices
  • Privacy and data safeguards are clearly articulated

Digital Access Standard

What to look for

  • The service leverages existing access points wherever possible, aligning with the Australian Government Architecture (AGA).
  • Consolidation, migration, and integration opportunities have been identified and pursued.
  • Decision-making frameworks have been applied where new access points are required.
  • Engagement has occurred with relevant partners both internally and externally (e.g. myGov, Services Australia) to ensure a seamless and consistent user experience.

Checklist

  • Consideration has been given to reusing or consolidating existing access points
  • How to consolidate access points has been determined in line with the relevant decision-making framework
  • Integration and migration opportunities have been explored
  • Engagement has occurred with relevant delivery partners

Digital Performance Standard

What to look for

  • The proposal demonstrates an understanding of how service performance will be monitored from an end-user perspective.
  • There is a plan to measure availability, reliability, and user satisfaction.
  • Data insights are used to inform ongoing service improvements.
  • The project demonstrates accountability for maintaining and improving digital service quality.

Checklist

  • There is a clear plan for monitoring digital service performance and user outcomes
  • Appropriate metrics (availability, satisfaction, effectiveness) are identified
  • A mechanism exists for using performance data to inform improvements
  • The agency demonstrates responsibility for continuous performance management

Downloadable resource

Checklist for independent assessors - PDF version

Connect with the digital community

Share, build or learn digital experience and skills with training and events, and collaborate with peers across government.